Skip to main content
· 3/27/1987

Mohr v. State Bank of Stanley

Citations

  • 734 P.2d 1071
  • 241 Kan. 42
  • 3 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1459
  • 1987 Kan. LEXIS 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming award of prejudg ment interest where bank permitted corporate officer to indorse checks and deposit proceeds in personal account
  • affirming award of prejudgment interest where bank permitted corporate officer to indorse checks and deposit proceeds in personal account
  • finding no detrimental reliance absent “acts, representations, admissions or silence” by a party
  • \[t]he usual rules governing the allowance of punitive damages are applicable in conversion cases arising under the U.C.C.\
  • “[t]he usual rules governing the allowance of punitive damages are applicable in conversion cases arising under the U.C.C.”
  • defense based on negligence of corporate payee is governed by § 3-406

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.