Mohr v. Sherman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a protest where the government “did not act arbitrarily or capriciously when it canceled the solicitation”
• granting plaintiff’s request for bid costs, denying injunctive relief, and ordering the parties to consult regarding the quantum of costs
• “The deprivation of [the opportunity to compete] satisfies [protestor’s] requirement to show irreparable injury” even though “the likelihood that [protestor] might have competed successfully for the contract ... seems remote.”
• “Judicial estoppel may apply when a party,” including a federal government entity, “takes a position before an administrative agency,” such as the GAO, “that is later contradicted before a court.” (citing Trustees, 593 F.3d at 1353–54)
• discussing FAR 15.305(b), and other cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).