Skip to main content
· 6/7/1999

Mohinder Parmar v. Jeetish Imports, Inc.

Citations

  • 180 F.3d 401
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11978
  • 1999 WL 415438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding “(1) double costs on [the] appeal . . . , and (2) reasonable attorneys’ fees in connection with [the] appeal and [the plaintiff’s] motion for sanctions” against the defendant for “frivolous invocations of appellate jurisdiction”
  • \[T]he denial of a statute-of-limitations defense may effectively be reviewed on appeal from a final judgment.\
  • \All interlocutory orders remain subject to modification or adjustment prior to the entry of a final judgment adjudicating the claims to which they pertain.\
  • “the denial of a statute-of-limitations defense may effectively be reviewed on appeal from a final judgment.”
  • \[T]he denial of a statute-of-limitations defense may effectively be reviewed on appeal from a final judgment.\
  • “All interlocutory orders remain subject to modification or adjustment prior to the entry of a final judgment adjudicating the claims to which they pertain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Pooler, Pollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.