Mohican Oil & Gas, LLC and MOG Producing, LP v. ConocoPhillips Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal with prejudice is proper when claims are barred 7 by Eleventh Amendment
• holding that 18 defendant did not waive immunity by not raising the argument in a 19 motion to dismiss
• holding that, in order to attempt to avoid the preclusive effect of a California state administrative decision, a party “must exhaust judicial remedies” by filing a petition for writ of mandate
• noting that “a party may seek prospective injunctive relief against an individual state officer in her official capacity”
• holding the Ex Parte Young 5 ||doctrine allows for prospective injunctive relief against state officials named in their 6 || official capacity
• holding “Under the Ex parte Young exception to that Eleventh Amendment bar, a party may 27 seek prospective injunctive relief against an individual state officer in her official capacity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).