Mohammed Yunus v. Department of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, to establish jurisdiction over an IRA 5 appeal, an appellant must, among other things, show that she exhausted her administrative remedies before OSC
• recognizing that the jurisdictional burden in an IRA appeal alleging whistleblower retaliation includes proving that an appellant has exhausted his administrative remedies before the OSC
• holding that the Board has jurisdiction over an IRA appeal if the appellant has exhausted his administrative remedies before OSC and makes nonfrivolous allegations that: (1
• holding that the Board has jurisdiction over an IRA appeal if the appellant has exhausted his or her administrative remedies before the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) and makes nonfrivolous allegations that (1
• finding that the agency’s explanation for its action should be judged based on the evidence before the agency at the time the action was taken
• holding that the Board has jurisdiction over an IRA appeal if the appellant has exhausted his administrative remedies before OSC and makes nonfrivolous allegations that: (1) he engaged in whistleblowing activity by making a protected disclosure; and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).