Mohammed Ibrahim Kandiel A/K/A Jeff Soun Howard v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in a federal criminal case, a defendant who is no longer in custody may be able to challenge his conviction by means of a petition for writ of coram nobis
• stating that in a federal criminal case, a defendant who is no longer in custody may be able to challenge his conviction by means of a petition for writ of coram nobis
• denying relief where petitioner “failed to show that coram nobis relief is required to achieve justice”
• fact that conviction rendered petitioner ineligible for record expungement not sufficient to render “in custody” for purposes of habeas review
• “Because Kandiel’s sentence was fully expired by the time he filed his section 2255 motion and the current deportation proceedings against him are merely a collateral consequence of his conviction, he is not ‘in custody for puqposes of section 2255.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).