Mohammad Naser Chorazghiazad v. Mohammad Chorazghiazad

Syllabus

This appeal concerns whether a quitclaim deed was forged. Mohammad Naser Chorazghiazad (\Plaintiff\) sued Mohammad Chorazghiazad (\Defendant\) in the Chancery Court for Wilson County (\the Trial Court\) alleging that Defendant took certain of Plaintiff's properties by means of a forged deed (\the Quitclaim Deed\). The Trial Court found by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant had indeed forged the Quitclaim Deed to give himself three additional properties that Plaintiff never agreed to transfer. Defendant appeals to this Court, arguing among other things that the evidence did not rise to the level of clear and convincing necessary to prove forgery. Given the testimony and evidence including the attendant circumstances surrounding the drafting and signing of the Quitclaim Deed, as well as the Trial Court's credibility determinations, we find, as did the Trial Court, that Plaintiff met his burden of proving forgery by clear and convincing evidence. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.