Mohamadou L. Tandia v. Alberto Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that discrepancy concerning dates when applicant started school was trivial detail because core claim involved being forced to change schools
• ruling that discrepancy concerning dates when applicant started school was trivial detail because core claim involved being forced to change schools
• explaining that corroborating evidence of injuries was not required because the petitioner did not go to a hospital
• under pre-REAL ID framework, remanding where adverse credibility determination rested on “insignificant details” such as dates
• under pre–REAL ID framework, remanding where adverse credibility determina‐ tion rested on “insignificant details” such as dates
• “Although [petitioner’s] opening brief in this court mentions his claims for withholding of removal and CAT relief, he does not set forth any arguments in support of these claims, so they are waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).