Mogyrossy v. Comfort Inn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in Wolston v. Reader's Digest Ass'n Inc., 443 U.S. 157, 167, 99 S.Ct. 2701, 61 L.Ed.2d 450 (1979
• explaining that, in Wolston v. Reader’s Digest Ass’n Inc., 443 US 157, 167, 99 S Ct 2701, 61 L Ed 2d 450 (1979), “the Court held that merely because events involving a private individual attract public and media attention does not transform that private individual into a public figure”
• under qualified privilege of “fair comment and criticism,” a defendant is not liable if publication was made in good faith and without malice
• \There is no basis under the Oregon Constitution to provide more protection to certain non-abusive communication based upon the content of the communication.\
• “There is no basis under the Oregon Constitution to provide more protection to certain non-abusive communication based upon the content of the communication.”
• “Where the qualified privilege of ‘fair comment and criticism’ was applicable, the defendants would not be liable if the publication was made in good faith and without malice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).