Mogul v. General Motors Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court took judicial notice that relevant product market could not be limited to the Cadillac, since other luxury automobiles were clearly in the same market
• court noted split of authority on this issue but found that it did not need to resolve it
• the party resisting the motion must show “significant probative evidence tending to support the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).