Skip to main content
· 10/25/1982

Mogensen v. Martz

Citations

  • 441 N.E.2d 34
  • 1982 Ind. App. LEXIS 1455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that intent to benefit a third party may be shown by “other evidence demonstrating the intent or understanding of the parties”
  • explaining that intent “may be shown by naming a specific [third party] or [third-parties] as a class”
  • “Third party beneficiaries may directly enforce a contract in Indiana.” (citation omitted)
  • “a clear intent to directly benefit [a third party] … may be shown by naming a specific [person] or [a group of persons] as a class, or by other evidence demonstrating the intent or understanding of the parties” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.