· 10/25/1982
Mogensen v. Martz
Citations
- 441 N.E.2d 34
- 1982 Ind. App. LEXIS 1455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that intent to benefit a third party may be shown by “other evidence demonstrating the intent or understanding of the parties”
- explaining that intent “may be shown by naming a specific [third party] or [third-parties] as a class”
- “Third party beneficiaries may directly enforce a contract in Indiana.” (citation omitted)
- “a clear intent to directly benefit [a third party] … may be shown by naming a specific [person] or [a group of persons] as a class, or by other evidence demonstrating the intent or understanding of the parties” (internal citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Garrard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.