Mogens Gjerlov and Jacob Verschoor v. Schuyler Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that contract claim was “clearly” intertwined with patent claims where “finding breach of the [contract] was dependent upon finding infringement of the patent”
• settlement agreements in patent cases should not be governed by federal common law but instead by state contract law
• “‘When an action embraces both patent and non- 25 patent claims, no fees under section 285 can be awarded for time incurred in litigation of the non- 26 patent issues.’” (quoting Machinery Corp. of Am. v. Gullfiber AB, 774 F.2d 467, 475 (Fed. Cir. 27 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).