Mogck v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reducing award for vague billing entries for 13 “continued work on case” and “research of issues”
• reducing selected time entries because attorneys “billed an inordinate amount of time 13 for interoffice conferences”; Coles v. City of Oakland, 2007 WL 39304, at (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 14 2007
• reducing 8 award for work that could have been delegated to a paralegal or secretary, such as “creating files, 9 reorganizing files, preparing tables of contents and tables of authorities, and preparing indexes”
• finding attorneys’ rates were reasonable because “ERISA cases involve a national standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).