Mogard v. City of Laramie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that implied consent advisement procedures were not a critical stage implicating the right to counsel in criminal DWUI proceedings
• discussing how the right to counsel, enshrined in both federal and state constitutions, is unlike the examples of “local concern” noted by the United States Supreme Court
• “A request for counsel made prior to the commencement of adversarial criminal proceedings does not invoke the right to counsel ... under [the state constitution.]”
• “A request for counsel made prior to the commencement of adversarial criminal proceedings does not invoke the right to counsel . . . under [the state constitution.]”
• “A request for counsel made prior to the commencement of adversarial criminal proceedings does not invoke the right to counsel . . . under [the state constitution.]”
• “A request for counsel made prior to the commencement of adversarial criminal proceedings does not invoke the right to counsel . . . under [the state constitution.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).