Mogabgab v. Stein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that discovery is necessary under section 1783 where it “bears directly on the key issues in th[e] case”
• holding compulsion of testimony in the “interest of justice” under Section 1783 where recipient was “at the center of many of the allegations asserted” and “[i]n light of the numerous allegations directly involving [the recipient] with the claims at issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).