Skip to main content
· 4/18/1994

Moffitt v. Carroll

Citations

  • 640 A.2d 169
  • 1994 Del. LEXIS 127
  • 1994 WL 143116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the legal right to post-judgment interest is attached on entry of judgment, not on later date when amount of judgment was modified
  • “In Delaware, trial courts have long had the inherent power to vacate, modify or set aside their judgments or orders during the term in which they were rendered.” (internal citation and quotations omitted)
  • “Under Delaware law, the trier of fact must conclude that at least two parties each failed to satisfy the requisite standard of care and was a proximate cause of the injury, i.e., each was negligent, before undertaking any analysis of their comparative negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.