Skip to main content
· 8/30/2005

Moffatt v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Citations

  • 390 F. Supp. 2d 560
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21671
  • 2005 WL 2402908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accepting respondent’s argument that, in Texas, “unexhausted disciplinary cases are procedurally barred from federal habeas corpus review because they cannot be reviewed in the prison grievance process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.