· 8/30/2005
Moffatt v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
Citations
- 390 F. Supp. 2d 560
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21671
- 2005 WL 2402908
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- accepting respondent’s argument that, in Texas, “unexhausted disciplinary cases are procedurally barred from federal habeas corpus review because they cannot be reviewed in the prison grievance process”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.