Moening v. Alaska Mutual Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[ujnder the common law, a prior suit on the note does not preclude subsequent judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure of the security”
• \Any agreement between the parties that the creditor will not seek a deficiency judgment and will look only to the security is enforceable.\
• “Under the common law, a prior suit on the note does not preclude subsequent judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure of the security”
• “Any agreement between the parties that the creditor will not seek a deficiency judgment and will look only to the security is enforceable.”
• note which fails to limit signer’s liability constitutes a personal obligation on which signer may be sued directly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).