Skip to main content
· 10/1/2004

Moeller-Prokosch v. Prokosch

Citations

  • 99 P.3d 531
  • 2004 Alas. LEXIS 114
  • 2004 WL 2211197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the superior court failed to “consider the detriment to [the child] if he were separated from his mother upon her move to Florida.”
  • holding court must engage in best interests analysis that includes “symmetric consideration” of consequences to child both if parent leaves with child and if parent leaves without child
  • describing symmetric analysis required when one parent wants to move out of state with child
  • “Performing the best interests analysis based on [the mother’s] assumed move requires symmetric consideration of the consequences to [the son] both if she leaves with him and if she leaves without him.”
  • requiring trial courts to symmetrically analyze consequences for child of parent’s relocation
  • \[Olur decisions recognize that courts may properly award primary custody to the relocating parent when that parent offers superior emotional stability.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.