Skip to main content
· 2/27/1989

Moelis v. Schwab Safe Co.

Citations

  • 706 F. Supp. 284
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1793
  • 1989 WL 16537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a state Medicaid agency can review the medical necessity of treatment prescribed by a doctor on a case-by-case basis”
  • upholding state's exclusion of experimental medical treatment from definition of \medically necessary\ services under Medicaid
  • remanding to the district court to decide “whether [the state’s] determination that transsexual surgery is experimental is reasonable”
  • remanding to the district court to decide “whether [the state’s] determination that transsexual surgery is experimental is reasonable”
  • remanding to the district court to decide “whether [the state’s] determination that transsexual surgery is experimental is reasonable”
  • treating issue of whether transsexual surgery was medically necessary as factual in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lasker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.