Moe v. New York City Department of Probation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “post- Lyall sweeps did not create new materially operative facts” and that the “operative event remains Denver’s practice of conducting homeless sweeps in an allegedly constitutionally deficient manner”
• explaining that federal law determines effects under the rules of res judicata of a judgment of a federal court
• observing that “the events that occurred after the plaintiffs filed this suit do not give rise to new material operative facts that create a new claim to relief”
• explaining differences between “area restrictions” and large-scale “encumbrance removals” and noting these activities are “colloquially known as homeless sweeps”
• relying on same release to conclude that the “plain text of the Lyall settlement agreement makes clear the parties intended it to have preclusive effect”
• describing the scope of the release in the Lyall Settlement as “far-reaching”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).