Modular Systems, Inc. v. Naisbitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a failure “to state with any particularity why or how the superior court erred in making [its] rulings and simply conclud[ing] that error was committed” leads to abandonment of the relevant issues on appeal
• arguing only that court erred is not the same as arguing an issue, so the issue is deemed abandoned
• acknowledging the plaintiffs’ separate claims for breach of a promissory note and breach of a guaranty agreement
• “The general rule for an enforceable contract to exist requires the signature of all parties to be bound.”
• failure to state with particularity why or how trial court erred in making rulings and simply concluding error was committed is same as not arguing an issue raised on appeal and is deemed abandoned
• mere conclusory assertions error was committed insufficient to preserve argument on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).