Skip to main content
· 5/7/2020

Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. Tanaka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Agnew court thereby corrected what it perceived as an arbitrators' legal mistake in a manner that Washington law does not permit\
  • “Agnew court thereby corrected what it perceived as an arbitrators’ legal mistake in a maimer that Washington law does not permit”
  • “[T]he award of [attorney’s] fees was included as a contract issue. Thus, the arbitrators had the power to decide the [attorney’s] fees issue, even if they did so wrongly.”
  • “arbitration [is] an expeditious means of resolving conflicts without involving the courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.