· 5/7/2020
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. Tanaka
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Agnew court thereby corrected what it perceived as an arbitrators' legal mistake in a manner that Washington law does not permit\
- “Agnew court thereby corrected what it perceived as an arbitrators’ legal mistake in a maimer that Washington law does not permit”
- “[T]he award of [attorney’s] fees was included as a contract issue. Thus, the arbitrators had the power to decide the [attorney’s] fees issue, even if they did so wrongly.”
- “arbitration [is] an expeditious means of resolving conflicts without involving the courts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.