Modern Environments, Inc. v. Stinnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a non-compete clause was overbroad and unenforceable because it prohibited the employee from being employed in any capacity by a competitor, rather than limiting the restriction to activities that directly competed with the former employer’s business
• conclusory statement that restrictive covenant protects a legitimate business interest, without explaining that interest, is insufficient
• challenge to contractual provision based on public policy “considered in the context of the facts of the specific case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).