Modern Continental/obayashi, a Joint Venture v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Secretary of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a district court's decision to deny a motion to compel filed after fact discovery deadline
• rejecting a vagueness challenge to a similarly worded regulation, 29 C.F.R. S 1926.501(b)(7)(ii), and concluding that \[t]he plain language identifies a specific hazard and delineates a specific precaution\
• rejecting a vagueness challenge to a similarly worded regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501(b)(7)(ii), and concluding that \[t]he plain language identi- fies a specific hazard and delineates a specific precaution\
• rejecting a vagueness challenge to a similarly worded regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501(b)(7)(ii), and concluding that \[t]he plain language identi- fies a specific hazard and delineates a specific precaution\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).