Skip to main content
· 7/24/2006

Modaressi v. Vedadi

Citations

  • 441 F. Supp. 2d 51
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49968
  • 2006 WL 2048483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a motion to dismiss is not a pleading for Rule 12(f) purposes
  • “Nothing in section 1391(b)(2) mandates that a plaintiff bring suit in the district where the most substantial portion of the relevant events occurred . . . .”
  • finding venue appropriate in the District of Columbia where funds acquired from the operation of a restaurant and nightclub in the District of Columbia were distributed and used in Maryland by the custodian of the funds
  • “the geographic distance between this Court and . . . the District of Maryland is far too small to present anything more than minor practical difficulties for the parties or their witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.