· 7/24/2006
Modaressi v. Vedadi
Citations
- 441 F. Supp. 2d 51
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49968
- 2006 WL 2048483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a motion to dismiss is not a pleading for Rule 12(f) purposes
- “Nothing in section 1391(b)(2) mandates that a plaintiff bring suit in the district where the most substantial portion of the relevant events occurred . . . .”
- finding venue appropriate in the District of Columbia where funds acquired from the operation of a restaurant and nightclub in the District of Columbia were distributed and used in Maryland by the custodian of the funds
- “the geographic distance between this Court and . . . the District of Maryland is far too small to present anything more than minor practical difficulties for the parties or their witnesses.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.