Mocznianski v. Ohio Dept. of Medicaid
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 165
Syllabus
The doctrines of equitable estoppel and promissory estoppel were inapplicable against the state because the state was engaged in a governmental function and no exception applied. Any erroneous attribution of evidence was harmless error because such evidence was not determinative of appellant's failure to comply with applicable Ohio Administrative Code requirements.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- whether a duty of ordinary care to warn of hazards involved in use of a manufacturer’s product “depends on mixed considerations of logic, common sense, justice, policy, and precedent”
- no duty to warn of danger created exclusively by a subsequent part from a separate manufacturer
- “Viad was aware that exposure would occur during the use and maintenance of its product because the evaporator needed insulation to operate properly, the navy used asbestos insulation, and workers would have to disturb the asbestos insulation to perform maintenance.”
- “the unreasonably dangerous product in this case was the asbestos insulation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.