Mockelmann v. Mockelmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that allowing divorced parties “to perpetuate disputes long after the entry of permanent orders” is “counter to the strong public policy favoring the finality of judgments” in family law actions
• “[Appellant] further contends that he is entitled to assert independent civil claims for theft and related torts.”
• a court has continuing jurisdiction to enforce its orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).