Skip to main content
· 2/7/2002

Mocega v. BRADFORD URQUHART, MD

Citations

  • 79 S.W.3d 61
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 1023
  • 2002 WL 192350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that findings of fact and conclusions of law were appropriate but not required because a dismissal under section 13.01 of the MLIIA is a sanction
  • reversing dismissal of medical malpractice action because trial court did not give notice of hearing on motion to dismiss, without performing harm analysis
  • reversing dismissal of medical malpractice action because trial court did not give notice of hearing on motion to dismiss, without performing harm analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott Brister

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.