· 2/7/2002
Mocega v. BRADFORD URQUHART, MD
Citations
- 79 S.W.3d 61
- 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 1023
- 2002 WL 192350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that findings of fact and conclusions of law were appropriate but not required because a dismissal under section 13.01 of the MLIIA is a sanction
- reversing dismissal of medical malpractice action because trial court did not give notice of hearing on motion to dismiss, without performing harm analysis
- reversing dismissal of medical malpractice action because trial court did not give notice of hearing on motion to dismiss, without performing harm analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott Brister
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.