Mobley v. O'Donnell
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 908
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in dismissing appellant's action pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). Appellant brought his declaratory judgment action to collaterally attack his judgment of conviction and sentence. But a declaratory judgment action cannot be used to collaterally attack a conviction or sentence. As such, his claims did not raise the justiciable controversy necessary for a declaratory judgment action. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 945×
- Foreman v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-26· cited 50×
- State ex rel. Mobley v. O'DonnellOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-11· cited 22×
- State v. MobleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-23· cited 6×
- Mobley v. O'DonnellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-11· cited 4×
- Mobley v. Supreme Court of OhioOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-11· cited 2×
- State ex rel. Mobley v. O'DonnellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.