Mobley v. Kirkpatrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The decision as to whether to make an opening statement, and its scope, is a matter of trial strategy.” (citing id.)
• “Federal courts routinely dismiss claims attacking a verdict as against the weight of the evidence on the basis that they are not federal constitutional issues cognizable in a habeas proceeding.”
• “Federal courts routinely dismiss claims attacking a verdict as against the weight of the evidence on the basis that they are not federal constitutional issues cognizable in a habeas proceeding.” (citing, inter alia, Ex parte Craig, 282 F. 138, 148 (2d Cir. 1922
• “Federal courts routinely dismiss claims attacking a verdict as against the weight of the evidence on the basis that they are not federal constitutional issues cognizable in a habeas proceeding.” (citing, inter alia, Ex parte Craig, 282 F. 138, 148 (2d Cir. 1922

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).