· 1/8/1991
Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos.
Citations
- 498 U.S. 211
- 111 S. Ct. 615
- 112 L. Ed. 2d 636
- 1991 U.S. LEXIS 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Explaining that' § 7(b) of NGA prohibits, a natural gas producer from abandoning its contractual obligations without first obtaining FERC permission to do so
- explaining that the Commission “enjoys broad discretion in determining how best to handle related, yet discrete, issues in terms of procedures, . . . and priorities” (internal citations omitted)
- observing that “[t]ime and again, the [Supreme] Court has recognized that even where an agency’s enabling statute expressly requires it to hold a hearing, the agency may rely on its rulemaking authority to determine issues that do not require case-by-case consideration”
- affirming as reasonable the FERC's raising some ceilings for old gas, under authority of § 104(b)(2), 15 U.S.C. § 3314(b)(2), to above market level
- affirming as reasonable the FERC’s raising some ceilings for old gas, under authority of § 104(b)(2), 15 U.S.C. § 3314(b)(2), to above market level
- allowing the Commission to issue “general, prospective, and conditional” abandonment approvals under § 7(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.