Skip to main content
· 9/14/1983

Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 716 F.2d 1187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff’s physician’s note was properly admitted because the letter fell within the business records exception to the hearsay rule
  • “[A] party is entitled to an instruction of [its] theory of the case only if the theory is supported by competent evidence. The evidence introduced at trial must warrant the giving of the instruction.” (citations omitted)
  • “[A] party is entitled to an instruction of [its] theory of the case only if the theory is supported by competent evidence. The evidence introduced at trial must warrant the giving of the instruction.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Cummings, Weigel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.