Skip to main content
· 4/2/1980

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Matagorda County Drainage District No. 3

Citations

  • 597 S.W.2d 910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding county drainage district had no implied authority to annex “lands upon which it cannot perform the services that the water code authorizes it to perform”
  • interpretation and effect of chapter 56 to district created prior to 1912 under Drainage Act
  • by annexing territory in gulf, drainage district acted beyond its limited powers
  • “It is the finality which makes a judgment a subject for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.