· 4/2/1980
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Matagorda County Drainage District No. 3
Citations
- 597 S.W.2d 910
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding county drainage district had no implied authority to annex “lands upon which it cannot perform the services that the water code authorizes it to perform”
- interpretation and effect of chapter 56 to district created prior to 1912 under Drainage Act
- by annexing territory in gulf, drainage district acted beyond its limited powers
- “It is the finality which makes a judgment a subject for review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.