Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S., Inc. v. Cajun Construction Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to qualify as habit evidence admissible as a routine business practice, “the plaintiff must show regularity over substantially all occasions or with substantially all other parties with whom the defendant has had similar business transactions”
• holding that to qualify as habit evidence admissible as a routine business practice, “the plaintiff must show regularity over substantially all occasions or with substantially all other parties with whom the defendant has had similar business transactions”
• “[T]he plaintiff must prove damages with reasonable certainty, but this merely means that the plaintiff must prove damages by a preponderance of the evidence as in other civil contexts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).