Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “petitioner must provide a reputable medical or scientific explanation that pertains specifically to the petitioner’s ease”
• holding that \[a] petitioner must provide a reputable medical or scientific explanation that pertains specifically to petitioner’s case\
• recognizing that special masters are obligated to evaluate the evidence, including the experts, before them
• holding that “preponderant evidence” necessitates more than a “’plausible’ or ‘possible’ causal link between the vaccine and the injury”
• holding that “[a] petitioner must provide a reputable medical or scientific explanation that pertains specifically to petitioner’s case”
• holding that “[a] petitioner must provide a reputable medical or scientific explanation that pertains specifically to petitioner’s case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).