Skip to main content
· 11/25/1925

Moberly Oil Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 3 B.T.A. 163
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding 2 tortfeasor’s affirmative acts created new danger giving rise to a duty to guard against the 3 criminal conduct of a third-party
  • affirming liability against city for murder committed when process server left victim alone with killer after serving protection order
  • discussing Crossen v. Skagit County. 100 Wn.2d 355, 359, 669 P.2d 1244 (1983)
  • “We reviewed the trial record, found ‘extended discussions’ about the jury instructions, and determined that the trial court understood the nature of [the defendant’s] objection.”
  • “So long as the trial court understands the reasons a party objects to a jury instruction, the party preserves its objection for review.’’
  • “ So long as the trial court understands the reasons a party objects to a jury instruction, the party preserves its objection for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansdon, Sterni, Arttndell, Iagen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.