M.O. Dental Lab v. Rape

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judgment which disposed of all named parties except one who had never been served was “final” for purposes of appeal
• holding that muddy conditions are not unreasonably dangerous as a matter of law because “[m]ost invitees in Texas will encounter natural conditions involving ordinary mud regularly”
• holding that muddy conditions are not unreasonably dangerous as a matter of law because “[m]ost invitees in Texas will encounter natural conditions involving ordinary mud regularly”
• concluding that an examination of the record revealed a judgment was final
• holding that naturally occurring mud was not unreasonably dangerous as a matter of law
• holding that naturally accumulating mud was not unreasonably dangerous as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).