M.M.T. v. T.A.T.

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 9126

Syllabus

Judgment reversed. The trial court speci?cally found that there is no evidence that appellant's use of alcohol affected her ability to safely parent her children. In addition, there was no competent, credible evidence presented to support the alcohol restriction as to appellant. Thus, the restriction on appellant's use of alcohol is both an abuse of discretion and against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's assignment of error one is sustained and we remand the case to the trial court with instructions to modify the Divorce Decree to remove the alcohol restriction as to appellant. As such, assignment of error two is moot.