MM Steel, L.P. v. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., e

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the antitrust plaintiff must show that the spokes “knew the essential nature and general scope of the joint plan”
• finding no abuse of discretion after district court allowed two competing experts to testify as to their projected profit models at trial
• “The decision to analyze the conspiracy under a per se theory of liability is a question of law that we review de novo.”
• “[A] distinction exists between agreements that are made between competitors (horizontal agreements) and agreements between manufacturers and customers (vertical agreements).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).