MLC AUTOMOTIVE, LLC v. Town of Southern Pines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a filing made within the requisite Rule 59(e) timeframe shall be construed as a Rule 59(e) motion
• holding that a filing made within the requisite Rule 59(e) timeframe shall be construed as a Rule 59(e) motion
• holding that a filing made within the requisite Rule 59(e) timeframe shall be construed as a Rule 59(e) motion (citing Dove v. CODESCO, 569 F.2d 807, 809 (4th Cir. 1978))
• holding that a filing made within the requisite Rule 59(e) timeframe shall be construed as a Rule 59(e) motion (citing dove v. CODESCO, 569 F.2d 807, 809 (4th Cir. 1978))
• stating that filings made within twenty-eight days after the entry of judgment are construed as Rule 59(e) motions
• explaining that postjudgment motions should be construed based on time period within which they are filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).