Mizrahi v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting same and stating “[p]recisely because [§ 846] proscribe[s] conspiracies . . . to violate only drug laws, we could not sensibly conclude that [it does] not fit within the broad phrase ‘any law . . . relating to a controlled substance’” in 8 U.S.C. § 1182(A)(2)(A)(i
• \Congress's use of the phrase 'relating to' in federal legislation generally signals its expansive intent.\
• “Congress’s use of the phrase ‘relating to’ in federal legislation generally signals its expansive intent.”
• “use of the phrase ‘relating to’ in federal legislation generally signals its expansive intent”
• a violation \need not be reflected in an actual criminal conviction; it can be evidenced by an alien's admission to a violation of law relating to a controlled substance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).