Skip to main content
· 7/7/1924

Mizell v. Mercer

Citations

  • 165 Ark. 224
  • 263 S.W. 398
  • 1924 Ark. LEXIS 478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • injuries “need not arise from something peculiar to the employment”
  • employer has the burden of proof when raising an affirmative defense
  • assault on an employee arose out of employment when “the conditions of [the employee’s] employment did not merely provide the time and place for the assault, but increased the risk of attack, and subjected him to a danger peculiar to his employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.