· 7/7/1924
Mizell v. Mercer
Citations
- 165 Ark. 224
- 263 S.W. 398
- 1924 Ark. LEXIS 478
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- injuries “need not arise from something peculiar to the employment”
- employer has the burden of proof when raising an affirmative defense
- assault on an employee arose out of employment when “the conditions of [the employee’s] employment did not merely provide the time and place for the assault, but increased the risk of attack, and subjected him to a danger peculiar to his employment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Humphreys
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.