Mize v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that some physical harm may be presumed from being “firmly grabbed” and “squeezed” in cases of simple battery
• holding that some physical harm may be presumed from being “firmly grabbed” and “squeezed” in cases of simple battery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Owens v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-01-17· cited 26×
• Hardy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-09-11· cited 25×
• Lyman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-10-14· cited 16×
• Dinnan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-12-05· cited 13×
• Mize v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-10-18· cited 13×
• Futch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-06-25· cited 9×
• Mark Futch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-06-25

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Goodrum v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1878-01-15· cited 42×
• People v. Garrett
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-04-19· cited 7×