Mize v. Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• according to employer’s unsworn declarations, the employer “would have further inquired about his medical history before hiring [plaintiff] if he had disclosed more information about his back and neck problems”
• employer “based its hiring decision in part upon whether applicants experienced prior back and neck trouble”
• “the link between prior and present injuries does not necessarily need to occur to the exact same vertebrae or tissue but rather in the same location on the body.”
• “Failure to truthfully answer medical questions or expound upon a condition when requested by the employer in a medical questionnaire test can forfeit a seaman’s right to maintenance and cure.”
• “Failure to truthfully answer medical questions or expound upon a condition when requested by the employer in a medical questionnaire test can forfeit a seaman’s right to maintenance and cure.”
• “Failure to truthfully answer medical questions or expound upon a condition when requested by the employer in a medical questionnaire test can forfeit a seaman’s right to maintenance and cure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).