Skip to main content
· 10/23/2008

Mixon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Citations

  • 959 A.2d 55
  • 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 419
  • 2008 WL 4657497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that summary judgment does not violate right to jury trial because it results in dismissal only if no reasonable jury could find for the claimant based on the undisputed facts
  • explaining that summary judgment does not violate right to jury trial because it results in dismissal only if no reasonable jury could find for the claimant based on the undisputed facts
  • This “court and others have held that in cases in which notice is an essential element of a plaintiff’s claim, res ipsa loquitur is inapplicable because it is inconsistent with the requirement of notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nebeker, Terry, Schwelb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.