Mitutoyo Corp. v. Central Purchasing, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court “abused its discretion by dismissing [a] claim for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b
• stating that the patent owner would be “unlikely [to] have been interested in less than a 29.2% [reasonable-royalty] rate,” equal to the patent owner's profit margin
• stating that the patent owner would be “unlikely [to] have been interested in less than a 29.2% [reasonable-royalty] rate,” equal to the patent owner’s profit margin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).