Mitsubishi International Corporation v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing tariff provision preceded by proviso similar to that here, which stated that tariff provision applied “[i]n the absence of special language or context which otherwise requires”
• stating “[w]e conclude the classifications were correct. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).