Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the challenged scope ruling unlawfully expanded the order at issue, the same order which is at issue in this case, by using an “actual use” standard
• scope of an order turned on the issue of dedication to an exclusive use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).