Mitsuba Publishing Co. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, inter alia, that circuit court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing defamation claim against state and Office of Consumer Protection because neither was a “proper partfy],” citing HRS § 662-15(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).